The vicious spirit is out of the box. By now we – those of us who read this blog – all recognise that countries will not stop imposing restrictions on civil society in the foreseeable future; to the contrary, those restrictions are growing by the year. Just in 2015, over 30 countries proposed or passed 45 laws to constrain civil society organisations (CSOs) and rights of CSOs and activists have been violated in over 100 countries.
But what is this ‘vicious spirit’ and who let it out?
Who’s to blame? Is it the newly budding populist and authoritarian leaders of this century? Or the masses of voters who elect such leaders and agree with their worldviews, including those on civil society? Democracies that weaken under the threats of terrorism, war and humanitarian crisis?
It is all of those and more; the phenomenon of shrinking civic space is complex and its root causes are difficult to tackle. As the problem has grown, more and more players became aware and got on board to address it: over the past couple of years, several dozen CSOs, donors, networks and international organisations launched ‘civic space’ projects, strategies and initiatives at the country, regional and global levels. Yet the negative trend remains. What are we doing wrong? MORE
Last year, CIVICUS reported substantial threats to core civil society freedoms of expression, association and peaceful assembly in
phenomenon. Citizens on all continents, in developing and developed societies, are suffering from the curtailing of their rights. Recent political initiatives in countries such as Hungary, Poland and the UK show that no society can be certain to escape this trend.

international secretariat, with the roles of
traced to the International Board’s decision in mid-2010 to recommend a new organisational model to best deliver Amnesty’s 
